The State of Connecticut has taken the first step in eliminating the death penalty which has generated some interesting discussion regarding whether or not those on death row should still be executed. This is mostly because of the recent conviction and death sentence for the two men who murdered the Petit family.
|Order this book from|
I believe it is morally wrong to condemn anyone to death, no matter how serious the crime, but when we begin to base our decisions on different criteria, choosing who lives and who dies, this is even more so. We as humans shouldn’t have the right to decide who lives and who dies, this should be left up to God. Yet we do it every day. We decide if a life is worth living or not, we impose the death penalty every day, every time an abortion is performed, we pronounce the death penalty on a person. The saddest thing about this is these people are convicted without a trial, without even a chance to defend themselves.
It never ceases to amaze me that the same people who want to abolish the death penalty because it is “cruel and unusual” punishment, support murdering others every day. These are the same people who would be up in arms and protesting in the same Connecticut legislature if there was a bill to outlaw abortion. I guess murdering unborn babies isn’t cruel and unusual punishment.